TL;DR:

• Vertical integration is a powerful business strategy for space entrepreneurs.
• It offers control, efficiency, and innovation by managing the supply chain in-house.
• Compared to outsourcing, it reduces long-term costs and speeds up development.
• SpaceX is a prime example of vertical integration success.
• Space startups can apply it selectively to gain a competitive advantage.

In the fast-evolving world of space entrepreneurship, every decision—from sourcing components to launching payloads—can impact cost, timelines, and long-term success. While startups are often encouraged to stay lean and agile, one traditional business strategy continues to stand out in this cutting-edge industry: vertical integration.

Space companies, from startups to giants like SpaceX, are proving that vertical integration isn’t just a relic of old-school industrial strategy—it’s a key driver of innovation, control, and competitive advantage in the space sector.

‍

What Is Vertical Integration?

Vertical integration is a business strategy where a company controls multiple stages of its supply chain, either upstream (sourcing raw materials or manufacturing components) or downstream (distribution and delivery). In contrast, horizontal integration focuses on expanding at the same level of the supply chain—such as acquiring competitors.

There are several types of vertical integration:

• Backward integration: Taking control of suppliers or raw materials.
• Forward integration: Controlling distribution or customer-facing processes.
• Balanced integration: Managing both ends of the supply chain.

In the space industry, vertical integration might mean building your own rockets, manufacturing avionics in-house, or managing launch services directly rather than relying on third parties.

‍

Vertical Integration vs Outsourcing

One of the biggest strategic questions space startups face is vertical integration vs outsourcing. Should you build it yourself or buy it off the shelf?

Outsourcing offers flexibility and speed, especially for new players without massive infrastructure. But when long-term goals include innovation, quality control, and cost management, vertical integration becomes harder to ignore.

Here's how the tradeoff looks:

Benefits of Vertical Integration:

• Improve efficiency by eliminating reliance on third-party timelines and quality standards.
• Reduce costs over time by avoiding middlemen and controlling the value chain.
• Protect IP and innovation by keeping proprietary designs and processes in-house.
• Align goals across production, engineering, and operations for faster iteration.

Disadvantages of Vertical Integration:

• High upfront investment in manufacturing facilities, equipment, and talent.
• Complex management of multiple business operations under one roof.
• Reduced flexibility compared to outsourcing, which can adapt quickly to changes.

‍

‍

Why Vertical Integration Works in Space

1. Speed and Agility in Hardware Iteration

In space entrepreneurship, especially in launch and satellite development, rapid iteration is crucial. Companies with vertical integration involved in their R&D and manufacturing pipelines can quickly test, revise, and re-launch. This agility provides a serious competitive advantage.

2. Control Over Quality and Supply Chains

In traditional industries, a supply chain hiccup might delay shipments. In aerospace, it can jeopardize a $100 million satellite launch. Vertical integration gives companies tighter control over tolerances, materials, and build quality—especially when working with cutting-edge technologies.

3. Lower Long-Term Costs

While the disadvantages of vertical integration include higher upfront costs, many space startups view it as a long-term investment. Once in-house processes are optimized, they can reduce launch costs, eliminate vendor markups, and achieve economies of scale.

‍

Case in Point: SpaceX and Vertical Integration

No conversation about vertical integration in space is complete without mentioning SpaceX. The company manufactures around 80% of its launch vehicle components internally—including engines, avionics, and even launch pads. This allows for rapid innovation, cost control, and full system integration.

By following a vertical integration strategy, SpaceX has been able to:

• Slash launch costs
• Accelerate the development of Starship
• Maintain tight timelines without external dependencies

Startups can’t all match SpaceX’s scale, but they can apply the same principles on a smaller level—such as building internal engineering teams or developing custom avionics.

‍

How Space Entrepreneurs Can Use Vertical Integration Wisely

Not every startup needs to build everything in-house. The key is to integrate strategically. Start by identifying critical systems or components that could benefit from tight internal control.

Ask yourself:

• Is this a core part of our value proposition?
• Are there recurring problems with vendors?
• Would in-house production reduce cost or improve speed?

If the answer is yes, it might be time to bring that process in-house—even if it starts small.

‍

The Bottom Line: The Future of Vertical in Space

In the coming years, space entrepreneurship will depend heavily on speed, flexibility, and the ability to innovate. While vertical vs horizontal integration will always be a strategic choice, the companies that gain an edge will be those that control their critical systems, improve efficiency, and own their process from end to end.

Vertical integration still matters—because in space, every component, timeline, and decision can make or break the mission.

If you're an emerging space entrepreneur, it's worth asking: What parts of your operation do you need to control to truly innovate?

Because sometimes, building it yourself isn’t just more efficient—it’s the only way to reach orbit.

Join Gravitate today!

‍